Due to the demographic developments, the number of people available in the labour market in Germany will be declining in the future. Then again, the demand for qualified labour force will probably not decrease. Accelerating digitisation is a striking example. It will replace a number of activities currently performed by people, but it will at the same time create new occupations and areas of activity. This quickly evolving world of work poses new challenges to gainfully employed population, and these challenges can be better coped with by means of qualification.<\/p>\n
Growing demands on skills also result from the increasing internationalisation of the economy. This applies, for instance, to language abilities, intercultural competencies or specific know-how regarding legal or technical regulations abroad, such as environmental or safety standards.<\/p>\n
In the course of the demographic and digital change coupled with growing international interdependences more and more importance will thus be attached to further training – along with school, vocational training, and higher education. Following stagnant participation in vocational further training between 2012 and 2016, on-the-job further training as the most frequently used form of further training has recently been on the rise again. For occupation-related further training outside the company, the level remained the same according to a report<\/a> by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research from 2019.<\/p>\n Against this backdrop, Germany has set itself the goal of developing a new further training culture as part of its national further training strategy. This is to allow people to cope with the structural change, as well as open up new chances to those with difficult start conditions.<\/p>\n Up till now, different groups of people have unequally participated in vocational further training. For instance, university graduates take part in further training far more often than workers without or with a vocational qualification. The employees whose activities could be largely replaced with modern technologies take part in further training rather seldom as compared to those whose activities are less likely to be replaced by a computer. Those working in large companies or certain sectors, such as education and healthcare, accomplish further training courses more often than those working in smaller companies and other sectors. And finally, the participation in further training among people without a migration background is higher than among those with a migration background.<\/p>\n According to the Federal Statistical Office,<\/a> more than every fourth person in Germany had a migration background in 2019<\/a>. Around eleven million people with a migration background were available for the labour market<\/a> as either gainfully employed or unemployed. This group of people is very multifaceted: The range can extend from an Australian scientist through a Spanish nurse to a young female refugee from Afghanistan that was deprived of going to school there.<\/p>\n This article focuses on the group of gainfully employed people with a migration background and their participation in the vocational further training. A differentiation is made between the migrants of the first generation, the migrants of the second generation, and Germans without a migration background (see info box), and it considers company-funded as well as non-company occupation-related further training of persons in dependent employment (in the following referred to as \u201cvocational further training\u201c). The analyses are based on the data of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP; see info box below) and focuses on the following questions: Is there a difference in training participation depending on whether those interviewed immigrated themselves (first\u202fgeneration), or whether they are children of parents who had come as immigrants (second\u202fgeneration)? How high is the participation rate of males and females, or the employees with different levels of qualification with a migration background? What is the role of the economic sector in which the people work? The findings on further training participation of the Germans in dependent employment without a migration background will be taken for comparison.<\/p>\n Firstly, the overall participation in vocational further training both of all employees with a migration background and of Germans without a migration background is analysed. Secondly, the participation is differentiated by first and second generation and by gender. Thirdly, qualification level and occupational status are taken into account. Finally, the economic sectors and the regions of origin are cosidered.<\/p>\n During the observation period between 2013 and 2015, nearly every third German employee without a migration background took part in vocational further training at least once (31\u202f%). Among persons with a migration background, the share was 25\u202fpercent (see Figure\u202f1).<\/p>\n As far as the first generation, i.e., those who immigrated themselves, is concerned, their training participation rate amounts to 20\u202fpercent. Yet, it is quite different with the employees from the second\u202fgeneration with a migration background: 33\u202fpercent of them took part in vocational further training, which is proportionately slightly more than in the case of Germans without a migration background (31\u202f%) (see Figure\u00a01).<\/p>\n A report<\/a> by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research from the year 2019 looks at recent developments. According to this report, the participation in further training schemes of people with a migration background increased between 2016 and 2018. This holds true for the first\u00a0generation and for the second generation alike, as well as for in-company and non-company occupation-related further training. At the same time, this report implies that the participation in in-company further training among those from the first generation is lower as compared to the second\u00a0generation or the persons without a migration background.<\/p>\n 35\u202fpercent of females in dependent employment from the second\u202fgeneration with a migration background took part in vocational further training at least once between 2013 and 2015 (see Figure\u00a01). So, they represent the highest participation rate of all\u202f\u2013\u202feven higher than the participation rate of German females and males without a migration background (31\u202f% respectively).<\/p>\n This is most likely due to the fact that 95\u202fpercent of the employed females from the second\u202fgeneration have a vocational or academic qualification, and comparatively often work as (highly) qualified employees \u2013 this has been revealed by supplementary evaluations. More than every third woman from the second\u202fgeneration is employed in the field of education and healthcare, and every fifth in the public sector. Those working in these areas are generally characterised by active participation in further training schemes (see table).<\/p>\n While considering all partial groups both with and without a migration background, the following becomes obvious: The higher the professional qualification, the greater the participation rate (see Figure\u00a02).<\/p>\n The lowest participation rate of 12\u202fpercent is observed among the immigrants from the first\u202fgeneration without any (recognised) professional qualification. Among the low-skilled Germans, the rate is still as high as 21\u202fpercent.<\/p>\n It is generally worthwhile mentioning that the employees of the second generation within each qualification group have higher participation rates in further training than the employees of the first\u00a0generation. In addition to this, the participation rate of the employees from the second\u00a0generation without and the second generation with a professional qualification is higher than that of the Germans without a migration background of these qualification groups. This is probably associated with the fact that the employees of the second generation comparatively often work in sectors requiring a lot of further training. Among university graduates, the further training rate of those from the second\u202fgeneration is approximately the same as that of German employees: Nearly every second individual in dependent employment attended at least one vocational further training measure.<\/p>\n Unskilled and semi-skilled workers have by far the weakest participation in vocational further training (see table). Across all comparison groups, the highest participation rates are observed among qualified and highly qualified employees, as well as among civil servants.<\/p>\n The immigrants of the first\u202fgeneration working in agriculture, trade, households and other service areas have by far the lowest participation rates (6\u202f% to 8\u202f%). Those working in the field of communication, financial and insurance services, in public administration or in the segments of education and healthcare constitute the group with the most active attendance of vocational further training measures\u202f\u2013\u202fregardless of the migration background (26\u202f% to 47\u202f%).<\/p>\n Persons with a migration background from the EU member states with a share of 26\u202fpercent take part in vocational further training proportionately more often than persons from third countries (from Turkey: 16\u202f% and from other third countries: 18\u202f%; see table).<\/p>\n With the help of multivariate analyses it can be investigated whether or not the migration background itself contributes to the explanation of further training participation, or whether the differences in further training participation between the employees with and without a migration background are associated with other factors, such as differences in qualification or occupational status.<\/p>\n While controlling different variables, the estimations show that the migration background not in every case implies a statistically significant connection with further training participation. The immigrants of the first\u202fgeneration have a significantly weaker participation in vocational further training as compared to the Germans without a migration background; however, those in dependent employment from the second\u202fgeneration reveal no statistically significant effect on the participation in further training. More active participation in further training of the employees from the second generation, or specifically women from the second generation that has been revealed in our descriptive analyses seems to be associated not with the immigration status, but rather with other factors.<\/p>\n What plays an important role here is a relatively good qualification structure of (female) employees from the second\u202fgeneration as well as their comparatively high occupational status. Our multivariate analyses reveal a significant role of these factors to explain the participation in further training. They therefore confirm the finding already known from the research of further training according to which the participation in further training increases in line with the qualification level, and varies among persons with different occupational status.<\/p>\n Another estimation result points to the significance of German language skills: our analyses show that the better the employees\u2019 command of German is, the higher the participation in vocational further training will be. Thus, proficiency in the German language and participation in language and integration courses not only increase the opportunities to access the labour market, as Herbert Br\u00fccker et al. demonstrated in a report<\/a> from the year 2019. In addition to this, these seem to have a positive effect on the access to vocational further training, and subsequently secure employability.<\/p>\n On average, individuals with a migration background in dependent employment participate in vocational further training somewhat less than Germans without a migration background in dependent employment (25\u202f% and 31\u202f% respectively). This difference, however, is due to the significantly lower participation (20\u202f%) of those from the first generation who immigrated themselves.<\/p>\n The further training rate of the employees from the second\u202fgeneration amounts to 33\u00a0percent, and is thus slightly higher than that of Germans without a migration background. Above all, there is one group with a migration background that has the highest participation rate as compared to all other groups: more than every third female employee from the second\u202fgeneration attended at least one vocational further training measure between 2013 and 2015.<\/p>\n Females in dependent employment from the second\u202fgeneration have a comparatively high level of professional qualification, and a substantial share of them work as qualified or highly qualified employees, as well as in the economic sectors such as education, healthcare or public administration that are characterised by high further training rates. This way, they feature all factors that favour the participation in vocational further training.<\/p>\n Individual groups of persons (with and without a migration background) thus relatively often participate in vocational further training. Nonetheless, the associated potentials shall be further tapped. Further training is not only a central instrument for the employees to keep up with the evolving world of work. It is also important for companies to meet their demand for skilled workers and to ensure adequate qualifications in the future.<\/p>\n Authoring Group Educational Reporting (2016): Education in Germany 2016. An indicator-based report including an analysis of education and migration<\/a>. <\/a> Accessed on 17.10.2019.<\/p>\n Br\u00fccker, Herbert; Croisier, Johannes; Kosyakova, Yuliya; Kr\u00f6ger, Hannes; Pietrantuono, Giuseppe; Rother, Nina; Schupp, J\u00fcrgen (2019): Second wave of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey: Language skills and employment rate of refugees improving with time<\/a>. IAB-Kurzbericht No. 3.<\/p>\n The Federal Ministry of Education and Research (ed.) (2019): Weiterbildungsverhalten in Deutschland 2018. Ergebnisse des Adult Education Survey \u2013 AES-Trendbericht<\/a>. Bonn. Accessed on 17.10.2019.<\/p>\n Fuchs, Johann; Kubis, Alexander; Schneider, Lutz (2018): Die deutsche Wirtschaft braucht k\u00fcnftig mehr Fachkr\u00e4fte aus Drittstaaten<\/a>. IAB-Forum from 17.05.2018.<\/p>\n Knize Estrada, Veronika J. (2018): Migrant women labor-force participation in Germany * Human capital, segmented labor market, and gender perspectives<\/a>. IAB-Discussion Paper No. 12.<\/p>\n Leber, Ute; Le Quang, Huy; Schreyer, Franziska (2019): Besch\u00e4ftigte ohne und mit Migrationshintergrund im Vergleich: Frauen der zweiten Generation nehmen am h\u00e4ufigsten an beruflichen Weiterbildungen teil<\/a>. IAB-Kurzbericht No. 19.<\/p>\n <\/p>\nFurther training opportunities of different groups of employees<\/h2>\n
Findings on vocational further training<\/h2>\n
Overall participation<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/iab-forum.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/BAA045919_IAB-Online_Forum_Beitrag_E-20-006_Grafiken_RZ_Figure1.jpg\")
<\/p>\nParticipation of the first and second\u202fgeneration<\/h3>\n
Participation of men and women<\/h3>\n
Participation of persons with different qualification levels<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/iab-forum.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/BAA045919_IAB-Online_Forum_Beitrag_E-20-006_Grafiken_RZ_Figure2.jpg\")
<\/p>\nParticipation according to the occupational status<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/iab-forum.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/BAA045919_IAB-Online_Forum_Beitrag_E-20-006_RZ_Table.jpg\")
<\/p>\nParticipation according to economic sectors<\/h3>\n
Participation according to the region of origin<\/h3>\n
Different factors that favour further training activities<\/h2>\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n
Literature<\/h2>\n